Typed Standards: relations to public projects

typedstandards-core-satellite-example: the SciOS core-and-satellite model applied to Typed Standards, published as two signed records, map.yaml and core.md.

The map places 34 public projects in three rings by their technical relation to Typed Standards, and the core record measures Typed Standards against the model's list of core responsibilities and assesses it as a satellite. This page is generated from those two signed files and the repository's README, and is not signed itself.

How Typed Standards was used here

Typed Standards, in its own record (core.md): A specification for signed records of how analytical artifacts were produced, including AI-assisted analyses of public data, with a reference producer, a reference verifier and a reference publishing application. Its mission: Make how an analytical artifact was produced checkable by anyone, offline, without trusting its publisher.

What was produced. Two signed records: package/core.bundle.json for core.md, and package/map.bundle.json for map.yaml. Each record carries:

How it was made.

  1. corpus/pin.mjs fetched each source once and pinned it: it recorded the SHA-256 of what the location served. Then it wrote core.md and map.yaml from the list in corpus/sources.json and those pins.
  2. package/build.mjs read the two finished files, then packaged and signed each one.

The key was generated for this example, outside the repository. It is now held in the publisher's 1Password vault, and signing runs only in the publisher's own terminal.

What you can check. After cloning the repository, in a terminal:

What it does not establish. The table below marks five things as not covered: who holds the key, when the records existed, inclusion in a public transparency log, revocation of the key, and whether any statement in either file is correct. It marks four more as asserted: signed, but resting on the signer's word.

Why it was useful.

Terms used below.

The map

Typed Standards: relations to public projects: 34 edges in 3 rings typedstandards.org at the centre, one end of every edge. Each numbered node is the other end of one edge, on its ring, shaped by relation. The table "Every edge" gives the same content as text. Standards the specification builds on.Ring 1 Adjacent standards, drafts and proposals.Ring 2 Implementations, possible emitters, and agent runtimes.Ring 3 1. W3C PROV-O (W3C) 1 2. in-toto Attestation Framework (DigestSet) (in-toto project) 2 3. Sigstore Rekor (hashedrekord) (Sigstore) 3 4. RFC 3161 Time-Stamp Protocol (IETF) 4 5. RFC 8785 JSON Canonicalization Scheme (RFC Editor (Independent Submission)) 5 6. RFC 8032 EdDSA (Ed25519ph) (IRTF Crypto Forum Research Group) 6 7. The did:key Method v0.9 (W3C Credentials Community Group) 7 8. Discourse Graphs (Discourse Graphs project) 8 9. C2PA Technical Specification 2.3 (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity) 9 10. W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0 (W3C) 10 11. IETF SCITT architecture (RFC 9943) (IETF) 11 12. SLSA Build Provenance v1.2 (SLSA project) 12 13. Nanopublication Guidelines (Nanopublication community) 13 14. Open Verification: the Proof-of-Control Standard for Agents (Advanced AI Society (steward), in the LFDT-ProofOfControl GitHub organization) 14 15. The Proof of Insight Protocol (Arclio LLC, as interim editor) 15 16. Project NANDA AgentFacts (Project NANDA) 16 17. MCP SEP-3094: Granular Citations Format (draft) (Model Context Protocol project (open proposal)) 17 18. ATProto Lexicon (Bluesky Social PBC (AT Protocol)) 18 19. Open Knowledge Format v0.2 (Google Cloud) 19 20. W3C DCAT 3 (W3C) 20 21. RO-Crate 1.3 (researchobject.org community) 21 22. Workflow Run RO-Crate 0.6 (Workflow Run RO-Crate working group) 22 23. MIRA schema (draft) (MIRA-science) 23 24. civicaitools.org (Civic AI Tools) 24 25. socrata-mcp-server (Civic AI Tools) 25 26. typedstandards.org verifier (Typed Standards) 26 27. typedstandards-eval-run-example (Typed Standards) 27 28. qsv (datHere) 28 29. Verikan (datHere) 29 30. MCP for CKAN (okfn/mcp-server) (Open Knowledge Foundation) 30 31. hi-oss-ai-red-teaming (Humane Intelligence) 31 32. Strands Agents (Python SDK) (Strands Agents) 32 33. Microsoft Agent Framework (Microsoft) 33 34. Open-source AI foundation layer (Mila and Mozilla initiative) (Mila and Mozilla) 34 not pinned typedstandards.org self-assessment: satellite subject of 28, object of 6

Ring 1 (8) Standards the specification builds on.

  1. W3C PROV-O
  2. in-toto Attestation Framework (DigestSet)
  3. Sigstore Rekor (hashedrekord)
  4. RFC 3161 Time-Stamp Protocol
  5. RFC 8785 JSON Canonicalization Scheme
  6. RFC 8032 EdDSA (Ed25519ph)
  7. The did:key Method v0.9
  8. Discourse Graphs

Ring 2 (15) Adjacent standards, drafts and proposals.

  1. C2PA Technical Specification 2.3
  2. W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0
  3. IETF SCITT architecture (RFC 9943)
  4. SLSA Build Provenance v1.2
  5. Nanopublication Guidelines
  6. Open Verification: the Proof-of-Control Standard for Agents
  7. The Proof of Insight Protocol
  8. Project NANDA AgentFacts
  9. MCP SEP-3094: Granular Citations Format (draft)
  10. ATProto Lexicon
  11. Open Knowledge Format v0.2
  12. W3C DCAT 3
  13. RO-Crate 1.3
  14. Workflow Run RO-Crate 0.6
  15. MIRA schema (draft)

Ring 3 (11) Implementations, possible emitters, and agent runtimes.

  1. civicaitools.org
  2. socrata-mcp-server
  3. typedstandards.org verifier
  4. typedstandards-eval-run-example
  5. qsv
  6. Verikan
  7. MCP for CKAN (okfn/mcp-server)
  8. hi-oss-ai-red-teaming
  9. Strands Agents (Python SDK)
  10. Microsoft Agent Framework
  11. Open-source AI foundation layer (Mila and Mozilla initiative) (not pinned)
typedstandards.org is at the centre because it is one end of every edge: the subject of 28 and the object of 6. Its own record, core.md, assesses it as a satellite and does not declare type: core. The rings group the edges and are not orbits: the map has no orbits edge (What the map leaves out). Each numbered node is one edge's other end, and each arrow runs from subject to object. Every edge gives the same as text.

What the map leaves out

No orbits edge

The published schema shows one edge type, orbits, from a satellite to a core. This map has no orbits edge. No core record exists in this domain to be the object of one, and the model says a core is never a satellite. Each edge names its relation in x-typedstandards.relation, because the published schema has no edge type for any of these relations.

map.yaml, x-typedstandards.edgeTypes

Not pinned (1)

Dropped (1)

Considered for the map and left out, with the reason map.yaml gives.

NameSeedReason
DSSE (Dead Simple Signing Envelope)Ring 1, listed with in-totoTyped Standards uses neither the DSSE envelope nor its pre-authentication encoding. It signs an Ed25519ph signature over the envelope-hash hex string (specification §8.3.1). The specification does name DSSE: its adjacent-standards table lists in-toto / DSSE (§5.5), and Appendix C lists DSSE as a candidate envelope-serialization profile for in-toto-native consumers. Nothing is built on it. The in-toto entry covers the conventions the specification does use.

The core record: core.md

selfAssessment: satellite, typeDeclared: false.

The record's basis for its self-assessment (4)
  • One maintainer. The project's roadmap says "The project is maintained by one person" (hub-roadmap, section 2).
  • The model describes a core as a body of people, "a community of humans, not a collaboration of artifacts", and reads one repository surfacing a record as, in spirit, a satellite.
  • Typed Standards is a specification, and the model says a core is not a standards body.
  • No core record exists in this domain, so the map beside this record carries no orbits edge.

Absence markers in the front matter (4)

Comment lines 6, 17, 18 and 19 of core.md. A YAML parser discards comments, so the generator reads them from the text.

Commented-out fieldAs written
type: coreNOT DECLARED. The self-assessment below is "satellite"; see x-typedstandards.
funding: {}NOT DONE. No fiscal host, no public ledger, no allocation rule; nothing is routed to other projects.
agent: {}NOT EXPOSED for this domain. The project's MCP server serves civic open data, not this domain's map; no vetted skills or eval suites for the domain.
certifies: []NOT DONE. No model, agent or tool is certified; no norms for AI-generated contributions.

Core responsibilities

The table from core.md (lines 90 to 99), whole. 5 of 8 verdicts read NOT DONE.

Core responsibility (the model's list)What this project doesVerdict
Hold an opinionated judgment on the domain: canonical, dependency, trusted, experimental, deadmap.yaml states technical relations to public projects. It marks nothing canonical, trusted or dead, and it is one maintainer's reading.NOT DONE
Maintain stabilized, canonical versions of the domain's artifactsThe specification (v0.1.9, CC BY 4.0) and its reference packages, versioned independently. They are this project's own artifacts; no other party has declared them canonical.Partial
Manage in-flow and distribution of fundingNone.NOT DONE
Build and maintain an agentic toolchain for the domainAn offline verifier library and a producer library that an agent can call, and an MCP server and a publishing skill for civic open data. No MCP endpoint serves this domain's map, and there is no eval suite.Partial
Certify or attest to AI behavior in the domainThe specification's attestation/certifies/v1 and attestation/evaluates/v1 sub-types are ratified and recognized by check #12. No check enforces their authorization rules or payloads (specification §8.12.4), and nothing is certified.NOT DONE
Act as a partner channel for AI labsNone.NOT DONE
Set internal protocols for governance, finance and satellite lifecycleA public roadmap and public decision records, each decided by the solo maintainer. No finance protocol, and no insertion, orbit, accretion, ejection or sunsetting protocol.Partial
The people: maintainers, governance, sustainability and domain rolesOne maintainer.NOT DONE

Every edge (34)

Every edge in map.yaml, in document order: the picture as text. → and ← as in the legend. Each edge's basis is in the collapsed table below.

#NameRingRelation
1W3C PROV-OW3C1→ builds-on
2in-toto Attestation Framework (DigestSet)in-toto project1→ builds-on
3Sigstore Rekor (hashedrekord)Sigstore1→ builds-on
4RFC 3161 Time-Stamp ProtocolIETF1→ builds-on
5RFC 8785 JSON Canonicalization SchemeRFC Editor (Independent Submission)1→ builds-on
6RFC 8032 EdDSA (Ed25519ph)IRTF Crypto Forum Research Group1→ builds-on
7The did:key Method v0.9W3C Credentials Community Group1→ builds-on
8Discourse GraphsDiscourse Graphs project1→ builds-on
9C2PA Technical Specification 2.3Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity2→ complements
10W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0W3C2→ adjacent
11IETF SCITT architecture (RFC 9943)IETF2→ complements
12SLSA Build Provenance v1.2SLSA project2→ adjacent
13Nanopublication GuidelinesNanopublication community2→ adjacent
14Open Verification: the Proof-of-Control Standard for AgentsAdvanced AI Society (steward), in the LFDT-ProofOfControl GitHub organization2→ complements
15The Proof of Insight ProtocolArclio LLC, as interim editor2→ adjacent
16Project NANDA AgentFactsProject NANDA2→ adjacent
17MCP SEP-3094: Granular Citations Format (draft)Model Context Protocol project (open proposal)2→ complements
18ATProto LexiconBluesky Social PBC (AT Protocol)2→ adjacent
19Open Knowledge Format v0.2Google Cloud2→ complements
20W3C DCAT 3W3C2→ complements
21RO-Crate 1.3researchobject.org community2→ adjacent
22Workflow Run RO-Crate 0.6Workflow Run RO-Crate working group2→ adjacent
23MIRA schema (draft)MIRA-science2→ adjacent
24civicaitools.orgCivic AI Tools3← builds-on
25socrata-mcp-serverCivic AI Tools3← complements
26typedstandards.org verifierTyped Standards3← builds-on
27typedstandards-eval-run-exampleTyped Standards3← builds-on
28qsvdatHere3← could-emit
29VerikandatHere3← builds-on
30MCP for CKAN (okfn/mcp-server)Open Knowledge Foundation3→ adjacent
31hi-oss-ai-red-teamingHumane Intelligence3→ adjacent
32Strands Agents (Python SDK)Strands Agents3→ adjacent
33Microsoft Agent FrameworkMicrosoft3→ adjacent
34Open-source AI foundation layer (Mila and Mozilla initiative)Mila and Mozillanot pinned: sha256 null. Only announcement pages exist, from Mila and from Mozilla, both dated 2026-09-17. No repository, specification or release is published, and an announcement page is not immutable.3→ adjacent
Every edge's basis, and the other end's id, location and SHA-256 (34)

Each ref is either a file at a 40-character commit SHA, a dated W3C TR URL, an rfc-editor.org text URL, or a published npm release tarball. A ref gives both the location and the SHA-256 of the bytes that location served when it was fetched. Where a project has no immutable location, the ref gives the location, a null sha256, and the reason in x-typedstandards.pin.

typedstandards.org's own end carries the same ref on every edge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/npstorey/civic-ai-tools/cfdb210cdae865a872ff30f7c86c5fdcd74e9886/docs/architecture/typed-standards-specification.md, sha256 0e3b54b39e6877a076c495b82afd7295aefac09c70054c02e9832147037ff3f5.

#Other endBasisLocation and SHA-256
1w3.org/TR/prov-oEvery record's provenance graph is PROV-O JSON-LD, and the envelope does not redefine derivation, attribution or generation (specification §5.5, §8.1.4).https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/
6b96671ab84faf12ce3f041aca12c3f93a6df2ed242348810743179a68e69555
2github.com/in-toto/attestationThe contentHash field uses the in-toto DigestSet convention (algorithm name to hex digest), and the type URIs follow the pattern of in-toto's predicateType (specification §5.5).https://raw.githubusercontent.com/in-toto/attestation/df02077bf97218a8860a5c534eff1f1381f56984/spec/v1/digest_set.md
0b1889fdea7f6d623b41555632aedf04ee4398cf02a32002060608c75ebb038e
3github.com/sigstore/rekorRecords submit hashedrekord entries, and verify-core checks Merkle inclusion against a pinned Rekor log key (specification §8.3.2, §9.2 check #8). This example's records carry no Rekor entry.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sigstore/rekor/a36bd716fd0d81c314092718f37b53dc26b2af38/pkg/types/hashedrekord/v0.0.1/hashedrekord_v0_0_1_schema.json
b8ecdc597ddb7e3289ae41e28fc3983ea25f248f531314a68dcc2361f3edada4
4rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3161Records carry RFC 3161 timestamp tokens, which verify-core checks against pinned TSA anchors (specification §9.2 check #7). This example's records carry none.https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3161.txt
39fd17644ff2d654bc83814a78b1c5b5e7517f496741f34ead5064943eb98240
5rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785The envelope hash is the SHA-256 of the RFC 8785 canonicalization of the unsigned envelope (specification §8.2).https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785.txt
63d52294eb0e3f0014174288186d388b4ddbf2c67d1ce8af1d9726eb0c3ab240
6rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8032Every record signature is Ed25519ph, defined in RFC 8032 §5.1 (specification §8.3.1).https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8032.txt
ed63657ff389301282b169b0abde9b5dd2c7e4d524fdfa5da6ff3094fc93c4c3
7github.com/w3c-ccg/did-key-specA self-certifying signer's identifier is a did:key in base58btc form, derived from the signing key (specification §8.5.1, hub ADR-0030). This example's two records use one.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c-ccg/did-key-spec/2cc490c38c5aacf58497a87fc0cf8794668bf716/index.html
e014a146acb0dcdafbdfee01226061d778da3ee72e8a048a7d53754c79675764
8github.com/DiscourseGraphs/schemasThe specification takes its claim, question and evidence content types and its support, opposition and answer relations from the Discourse Graphs pattern (§5.5, §7.5). Those content types are specified, not built, and the current schema file names its relations differently.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DiscourseGraphs/schemas/19403e9e28d505dbce6cd2af5868eb27af6e3e36/owl/dg_core.ttl
0e41bd5223785716146fac882667a56afdb14e705380c41704174a55f82a8982
9github.com/c2pa-org/specificationsC2PA binds signed provenance manifests to media assets, and Typed Standards signs production records for analytical artifacts. It is the same job for a different artifact class, and neither depends on the other (specification §5.5).https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c2pa-org/specifications/6998a277b4519fc652550686861f0b97a64e5c19/build/site/specifications/2.3/specs/C2PA_Specification.html
0d2a8936068caa60cbb5ad8f04d8c83dccf700d3f9d97fb9b589f862438a37d1
10w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0A data model for issuer-secured claims about a subject. It does not model how an artifact was produced (specification §5.5).https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/REC-vc-data-model-2.0-20250515/
a9196a3d0b6601356c4e127bad24f8c7f2c17f6ed22e41b35755a910104156f8
11rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9943An architecture for transparency services that register signed statements of any payload type and return receipts. That is the transparency layer Typed Standards fills with Sigstore Rekor today.https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9943.txt
204aea020731e1306e8ffe0aaae5c9559a7a8edf24bd089ae79d6a6d6c7676f1
12github.com/slsa-framework/slsaBuild provenance for software artifacts, carried as an in-toto predicate. Typed Standards covers analytical artifacts instead (specification §5.5).https://raw.githubusercontent.com/slsa-framework/slsa/19e4e2f005f871270c4f555fc47afecfb37f3efe/docs/spec/v1.2/build-provenance.md
182ab5cf823c374874136371466ba43f99f0a9ba87a8046757d26a2ed74854a0
13github.com/Nanopublication/GuidelinesNanopublications are RDF named graphs that pair an atomic assertion with its provenance and publication information. Typed Standards is envelope-first JSON with capture-method labels, and consuming one as the other is not built (specification §5.5).https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nanopublication/Guidelines/8388dd90795b264f4b01c64d0f7218babcae4871/index.html
f3ee522113a4372604d61ff2cae25ee307cedbcc5ab1094a3e86c5ebff56dbbb
14github.com/LFDT-ProofOfControl/ov-poc-standardSpecifies audit requirements and an evidence-token format (JWT and CWT) for an agent's runtime control: the data it touched, the authority it used, the tools it invoked. It points to SLSA and in-toto for artifact provenance and defines no record of how an analytical artifact was produced.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LFDT-ProofOfControl/ov-poc-standard/22c7b625be459f5eee7dd8690afd080b5141b8c6/0.1/en/0x01-Frontispiece.md
28323b575b63255c6636c62ef748fb694455f86d56fa81bf28b6fc31c20b3eb5
15github.com/proof-of-insight/specSpecifies the same kind of object as Typed Standards: a signed, content-addressed record of how an analysis was produced, as a graph of observe, compute, reason and attest steps, with a Sigstore Rekor profile. It is working draft v0.7.0, and neither depends on the other.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/proof-of-insight/spec/6f390d76a3a660d3863fd7341062bdfdc3ec29f2/versions/v0.7.0.md
e6a63102bf7830b982e7740afdb4610e74a908ad3434e8b64122dcbbd636b2b0
16github.com/projnanda/agentfacts-formatA JSON Schema for agent metadata (identity, endpoints, capabilities, evaluations, certification), used for discovery and routing. It defines no record of how an output was produced.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projnanda/agentfacts-format/89e938c08a7166341201568055c0a3b6852d26e4/agentfacts_schema.json
34495d046d6c579209296c8a4ffcd32b7ff2624733d63eda6ada8df8dbef1745
17github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/3094Proposes that MCP tool results carry citations to source fragments. Its content-integrity section says the proposal 'punts on a decision to add integrity checks', which a signed record provides at another layer.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/109bbfe75d43c93a23ee17aa2b6dcdf05d21b338/seps/3094-granular-citations-and-fragment-addressing.md
ebc6d82df5d14ada988d90506029be251674a272184ef0f958d4ab54f0a80715
18atproto.com/specs/lexiconA schema language for typed records in the AT Protocol. The SciOS paper names it as a model for its common schema. Neither depends on the other.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bluesky-social/atproto-website/7a6cdd6c7b48d2aa8d93293827374e0c4fdbb305/src/app/%5Blocale%5D/specs/lexicon/en.mdx
3c893eb2eb94c50c12ad491d9b75f3965af49d8328be5140bea628126969be55
19github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/knowledge-catalog/okfOrganisational knowledge as Markdown files with YAML front matter, with provenance and attested-computation fields that are not signed. A raw-bytes/v1 record can sign such a file byte for byte, as this example signs core.md. The SciOS paper names it as a model for its schema.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/knowledge-catalog/22efaa5402775a7c4d4c37f89e41258daaf3cb65/okf/SPEC.md
26aa5da029278939f914e578107242d9607d4f2dc5fe153272b82f9ed1030101
20w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3DCAT describes datasets and catalogs for discovery. A record's data-source references may cite DCAT-described datasets (specification §5.5).https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/REC-vocab-dcat-3-20240822/
068b43f7814525ea784b7d565ada8de2b4538f5377517c4f0ec9b162a34dedfb
21github.com/ResearchObject/ro-crateA JSON-LD packaging format for research data. The specification names an RO-Crate compatibility profile as the direction for a multi-file package (open question Q1). Nothing is built.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ResearchObject/ro-crate/22fbd7e098ccd2839c80967e363a2201528a2efe/docs/_specification/1.3/structure.md
e63fe86d1a098d01ab9ea71af4f0f8742ab9fbcd29fe8afc7b55837c0e5d96e9
22github.com/ResearchObject/workflow-run-crateRO-Crate profiles for recording tool and workflow executions. The specification names WRROC with RO-Crate as the direction for a multi-file package. Nothing is built.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ResearchObject/workflow-run-crate/3c5b530c3d2784169e461d3273855a6b3a57246e/docs/profiles/0.6/workflow_run_crate/index.md
204a5af0f2823899503fe150d53feccb2a04b2f5f9988d9f605d2b4d269cb597
23github.com/MIRA-science/schemaA draft LinkML schema for question, claim and evidence graphs over research papers, built on Discourse Graphs and PROV. It signs nothing.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MIRA-science/schema/f42c5966629cbc90ca09464b52d55c82c4f21116/mira.yaml
21eafff5ac0bd7ad5ef9edcd867491824a4ff833b4af1096cb4cdb4298eaae0a
24civicaitools.orgThe reference publishing application. It answers questions over civic open data through MCP servers and packages each published analysis as a signed record package.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/npstorey/civic-ai-tools-website/109eecb809a53bd36cc3468c79d243457570a49d/README.md
ba16dd52cf07fe369bf6359d22bfe36bae345614179fd14d5e814ac481cde89f
25github.com/npstorey/socrata-mcp-serverAn MCP server that gives AI tools query access to Socrata open-data portals. It serves the tool results an analysis cites, and signs nothing itself.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/npstorey/socrata-mcp-server/5b18c979b37465999d686785074973a340207555/README.md
7e4a5242bf2d8f2439ef0963b9afb823fbfced25bcc7bad59375c5dca618ae02
26typedstandards.org/verifyThe site's client-side verifier runs verify-core's checks on a record package in the browser.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/npstorey/typedstandards/b0bf0a447ba35991ca2a211fa71983e1ba9ac78e/README.md
c0a1894c4089a615d685b420d632f50b9edfadd963a58fda9c7b9e025a086f9c
27github.com/npstorey/typedstandards-eval-run-exampleTurns one public AI benchmark evaluation run into two signed record packages that verify offline with one command (hub ADR-0028).https://raw.githubusercontent.com/npstorey/typedstandards-eval-run-example/9031a94eebe0d800e52eab6fd4e01c7e788603a6/README.md
3e405213b53a67e9ebffa7e1f332b34ddbbd3c894d6b1c556c8ca25109930529
28github.com/dathere/qsvAn open issue on the project's own tracker, titled with the intent, and a plan comment posted from the maintainer account describe emitting JCS envelopes and Ed25519ph signatures for the Data Schematic output. The issue is open and labelled revisit-later.Stated in: https://github.com/dathere/qsv/issues/4448 (2026-08-20); https://github.com/dathere/qsv/issues/4448#issuecomment-5440060941 (2026-08-27); https://github.com/dathere/qsv/issues/4448#issuecomment-5649582321 (2026-09-13).https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dathere/qsv/7c43b6bc77b22556220328eef22f29b9fac6d24b/README.md
1541ba978efb0231096072c945df32e282dda499fb6a919bee13a987c3efb639
29github.com/dathere/VerikanIts README at the pinned release lists a module that builds 'Typed Standards evidence packages' and states 'Evidence format by Typed Standards'. Its package builder targets the datHere content profile at specification revision v0.1.7.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dathere/Verikan/8e5e85fdda9829d142358c51f9b5db797333ed47/README.md
28e521a2d04351228578376487b4354e3ef39e9c2f46c2072d59eadee66dfe0b
30github.com/okfn/mcp-serverAn MCP server for CKAN portals, in an early research phase, whose repository states the aim of making AI-generated answers traceable to their underlying datasets. It states no intent to produce signed records.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/okfn/mcp-server/38f65642325067feb3c0354f046a19b80520d526/README.md
b0937703f25c094df17c2f1f98389a98da9074c458c579936bf5c9ede0a326b8
31github.com/humane-intelligence/hi-oss-ai-red-teamingA platform for human red-teaming evaluations of AI systems that keeps reviewable records (conversation capture, reviewer verdicts, an append-only audit trail). None is signed, and its public text states no intent to produce signed evaluation records, so no evaluator relation is asserted.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/humane-intelligence/hi-oss-ai-red-teaming/046a45d5a37339133c4b3f527276bbf9fb2b61bc/README.md
0b0343ea53fce2f3655b9bde927340c2852c95f1efbca9d9298d54f525ccffde
32github.com/strands-agents/harness-sdkAn agent SDK that runs the model and tool calls a producer records in queries[] and trace. Its README states nothing about provenance or signing.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/strands-agents/harness-sdk/45c2ffd3333cdb67c1dd9f4f208639ce3b89aa19/strands-py/README.md
a5f8050bf77d175f9208e80d163e0f5ca337a50332fec05523e202c43f2742c3
33github.com/microsoft/agent-frameworkAn agent and workflow framework with built-in OpenTelemetry tracing, the trace shape a record's trace field carries. Its README states nothing about signed records.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/agent-framework/0c9944cc9f577d51277ac7c55dbc388b60a577af/README.md
4a628aa224c014ff326587cc543a4991e483e11723a226f6fcdb22664224c58a
34mila.quebec/en/news/mila-and-mozilla-announce-new-initiative-to-build-trustworthy-open-source-ai-for-everyoneAn announced open standard of interface contracts, with a self-hosted reference implementation for running AI systems. Nothing is published yet, and the announcement says nothing about provenance or signing.https://mila.quebec/en/news/mila-and-mozilla-announce-new-initiative-to-build-trustworthy-open-source-ai-for-everyone
not pinned: sha256 null

What the records prove / what they do not

From README.md (lines 85 to 109), whole. README.md is not a signed record.

This section describes the offline output of verify-core as node verify.mjs prints it (docs/verify-output.txt).

Attested:
checkable by anyone from the bundles in package/. The row names the check that establishes it.
Asserted:
stated inside the signed bytes, but resting on the signer's word. No check establishes it.
Not covered:
nothing in this repository addresses it.
PropertyStatusWhy
The bytes of core.md and map.yamlAttested (#3, #4, #1)Each record carries its file's exact UTF-8 bytes inline, under raw-bytes/v1 (#3 ok). #4 recomputes contentHash.sha256 from those bytes (ok), and #1 recomputes the envelope hash (verified). The digest is the file's ordinary SHA-256, so shasum -a 256 checks it without any Typed Standards code, and verify.mjs compares each file on disk with its signed output byte for byte.
The signature over each recordAttested (#2)Ed25519ph over the envelope-hash hex string. Valid for both records.
One key signed both recordsAttested (#14, #2)#14 reports key_derived_match for each record: the did:key identifier is derived from the public key in that record's signature. verify.mjs then confirms that both signatures carry the same key and identifier.
The key names itself consistentlyAttested (#6, checked by verify.mjs)signature.kid, metadata.signingKeyId and signer.identifier are one string. No verifier implements spec check #6 (typedstandards#88), so verify.mjs checks it directly.
Who holds the keyNot covered#5 reports self_certified with verified: false: no trust registry and no domain vouch for the key. displayName names the example, not a person.
Capture method and producer profileAsserted#15 reports ok: script-run is a value the scripted-recomputation profile allows. No check establishes that one program wrote the files and a second one packaged them. The label is signed, so it cannot be changed without breaking #1.
The source digestsAssertedcorpus/manifest.json pins 40 sources. The map record lists the 34 it uses and the core record the 11 it uses, 5 of them in both, in queries[].arguments: location, SHA-256, bytes, HTTP status, fetch time and stated licence. These are signed assertions that no check recomputes. Every location is immutable, so anyone can re-fetch it and compare. An accidental second fetch, 38 seconds after the pin, got identical digests for all 40 (docs/pin-record.md).
core.md and map.yaml follow from the manifestAssertednode corpus/pin.mjs rewrites both files from corpus/sources.json and corpus/manifest.json without the network, and git diff --exit-code shows the same bytes. That reproduces the writer, but it is not a §9.2 check.
The relations, the bases and the self-assessmentAssertedThey are the signer's reading of each project's own public text. No check evaluates them, and the published schema has no edge type for any of these relations.
When the records existedNot coveredCheck #7 reads n/a because no RFC 3161 token was requested. External proofs are left out of this version (gate G1, D7), and metadata.createdAt is the signer's own claim.
Inclusion in a public transparency logNot coveredCheck #8 reads n/a because no Rekor entry was submitted. A Rekor entry is public and permanent, and a record re-signed after a gate would leave an abandoned hash in the log under this key.
Revocation of the keyNot coveredA did:key has no rotation and no revocation (hub ADR-0030 §7).
That any statement in either file is correctNot coveredA signature shows the bytes are unchanged since signing, not that they are true (spec §5.3).

Provenance

generated from map.yaml @ 38945eb4cb3ac6528f77647e082778fa8d0ebc9afb66c8cc25508127ba8d155c, core.md @ c85c650af7c47608a27cff4f6760d3313d62ff18095e8f4f0fdb947df6aece3b, README.md @ 21f956a13e0f1a18065999baeee0e8fe010d9c5a55ff4c5318db562bd02f9d6a

Generated by site/generate.mjs in github.com/npstorey/typedstandards-core-satellite-example, with one YAML parser, yaml, pinned exactly. The page carries no generation time: it is a function of the three inputs alone.

The three inputs
InputSigned recordSHA-256
map.yamlYes38945eb4cb3ac6528f77647e082778fa8d0ebc9afb66c8cc25508127ba8d155c
core.mdYesc85c650af7c47608a27cff4f6760d3313d62ff18095e8f4f0fdb947df6aece3b
README.mdNo21f956a13e0f1a18065999baeee0e8fe010d9c5a55ff4c5318db562bd02f9d6a

Yes: the file's bytes are the inline output of its record in package/, and its SHA-256 is that record's contentHash.sha256. The generator refuses to write this page otherwise. README.md is an input because the sections above that come from it are in neither signed file.